Russia Adoption Blog

07/17/07

Say No To Photolistings

Posted by : Virginia M. Citrano in Russia Adoption Blog at 06:19 am , 566 words, 580 views  
Categories: The Process, Picking An Agency, Referrals
Camera
Recently, somebody I know asked me if I would talk to somebody they knew about adopting an older child from Russia, a child this person had found on an adoption photolisting site.

I hesitated.

Not because I don't like talking about adoption. I love talking about adoption from Russia and I will talk with anyone about it anytime. Heck, I write the equivalent of a book about it every month on this Web site.

Not because the person was considering an older child. The younger of my two sons was nearly five when he came home from Sakhalin Island, and I'll tell anyone who asks that adopting an older child is every bit as wonderful as adopting a toddler.

It was the photolisting part that bothered me. I don't like them.

A picture may be worth 1,000 words, but it can open you up to trouble in adoption. Simply put, you can fall for a cute face that is the wrong match for your family. A child whose medical or family history may present challenges that you are not prepared to handle. A good agency, as I have written before, should ask you to provide lots of information about the child you are looking to adopt and lots of information about you, and then work to make the best possible match of the two. A good agency also gets to know the children in the region it serves. I cannot tell you how many kids ran up to my agency's coordinator in Sakhalin, addressed her by name and talked to her about their lives. And she knew them.

I also, frankly, don't see how foreign photolisting sites square with Russia's increased desire to protect the privacy of the children in its care. If I use the Ministry of Education's own databank, I can look for children by age, gender, eye and hair color, or region. But the information I get isn't much more than a one-word answer to those points. There's no medical history, except the quixotic listing for "Nature". Bless This Child, one of the American agencies that has been approved as a non-governmental organization in Russia and is now waiting for new accreditation, has this note on its Web site:

We do not recommend reviewing the Central Data Bank in search of potential children to adopt. The website is in Russian because it is only available to Russian citizens. Please also note that we cannot choose children from the Data Bank and we have no way of confirming any information of children on this list.

SPONSOR


Which brings me to my next point. Too many of agencies listed as the contact points for the children on the foreign photolistings do not appear on the Web site of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow as having either NGO status or accreditation. In case you've missed my earlier rants, you don’t want to be heading into Russia now with an adoption facilitator that lacks these credentials.

And finally, there's this: I don’t think I would have picked either of my kids based on the first photos I saw of them. One was, as I affectionately tell him, "a scrawny little chicken" dressed in girl's pajamas. The other had most of his front teeth missing. But my agency had gotten to know both these kids, and knew they were the perfect kids for me.

And they are.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: John [Member] Email
Virginia, you have hit upon the classic argument over photo listings. They are bad, people are going to fall for a cute picture every time to their peril, I want a social worker to pick my child for me. Or, they are great, I can learn a great deal from a photolisting, enough to know if I want to make that first call, there is no way any social worker is going to pick my child.

I did the opposite, I picked all four of mine, using photolistings. There is a great deal in the photo alone, what is the expression, does the child look stressed, is he refusing to smile, is he looking directly at the camera, is there any physcial problem showing. Without a write up, the photo is very limited in value. One word responses to standard questions is insulting and worthless.

I found that it was possible to narrow my search quickly with the listings. The kids I bought home were remarkably close to the kids described in the listing. Naturally, the first call is only the start of a long exchange with the child's worker, many times issues come up that stop the process, ie issues not disclosed earlier.

The idea of the worker choosing my child is mind boggeling. They have their own biases and preferences. I wouldn't let some else choose my wife, and I certainly wouldn't want a worker choosing my child.

The issue of the really good looking child is interesting. Each parent will have their own ideas of what is good looking and why. If you have parented for a while, you know to stay away from the super good looking ones. They have learned to use their looks and cuteness to maniplulate, and they are likely to be more resistant to structure.

I am glad the other way worked well for you. I suspect you are more in tune with your needs and desires, and are able to better put them down on paper. That would make remote picking far more likely to work. I still think that is brave. John
PermalinkPermalink 07/17/07 @ 13:27
Comment from: Stefanie [Member] Email
Hmm interesting points on both sides...
I understand that some people may take on too much after falling in love with a child on a photolisting.
However, as a prospective adoptive parent, I have to say that if a social worker presented me with just some limited written information on a child, along with a list of 'special needs'- e.g. "ventricular septal defect, cleft palate, delays in speech and fine motor skills, possibly hep b positive," I would probably be very reluctant to become more involved. I am not necessarily incapable of dealing with these conditions, but boy do they look intimidating when printed in a long black and white list! Why would I feel drawn to 'take these on' when I feel no connection to this child? However, a photo can radically change things. From past experience of looking at photolistings, I know a photo can so easily provide that impetus, that push to research the conditions, break them down and analyse them, view them as just one small part of an incredible human being. Then, I often find I am struck with the realisation that these "special needs" do NOT lie outside of my capabilities - I just find it easier to bypass them, to claim I "couldn't handle those," than to give the matter proper consideration, when I am looking merely at a case number, not at the face of a precious, and very real, child.
It is this potential to provoke thought (for the better) in some people, in some cases, that makes me support photolistings (with v. limited personal information)
Just my thoughts, but ver interesting post, Virginia.
~Stefanie
PermalinkPermalink 07/17/07 @ 15:54
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Related Discussions

    Misc

    Subscribe to Russia Adoption Blog

     Enter your email address:
     

     

    Who's Online?

    • carolisabeachlover
    • Guest Users: 114