Russia Adoption Blog

10/25/06

I wasn't going to talk about Madonna, but...

Posted by : Adrienne Bashista in Russia Adoption Blog at 08:28 am , 467 words, 74 views  
Categories: Health concerns for adoptees
Aaaaaggggggghhhhhhhh!

I am very sick of the Madonna thing. Very sick. And I'm sick that I'm even posting about it BUT the two places I go to "get away" from adoption issues on-line, Salon.com and one of my favorite blogs whose site I won't link to since it is full of swears and political thoughts that adoption.com won't like (but e-mail me at adoptrussiablog@adoptionmail.com if you'd like a link) both have comments on the old material girl and so I can't get away. I might have to actually get off the computer and read a book, I'm so annoyed by it all.

You are probably asking, Adrienne, what the heck does Madonna have to do with Russian adoption, anyway? Well, I answer, Madonna adopting from Malawi seems to equate baby buying to some people, and so international adoption then equates baby buying, and if you are adopting from Russia (think adopting a Caucasian child) not only are you buying a baby but you're racist as well. So I think it does all relate, in a roundabout, disturbing way.

SPONSOR

On Salon, Mary Kane, an adoptive parent, writes pretty much what I've been thinking about the whole Madonna thing. Here's the link. As usual, however, the best thing about this essay is the letters people have sent in reponse. To read the voices of sanity, read the starred letters. To read the voices of the population at large, read all the letters. There's a lot of "baby buying" discussion going on there - and the gloves are OFF.

The other blog (the one I love to read but cannot link to due to profanity, etc. - like I said, email me if you want the link) comments on Madonna's baby's biological father and what he's said in the press. A number of bloggers on this site have also commented: here, here,
and here, to mention a few.

I don't have all that much to add to the discussion since it's all being said, but I'll leave you with one question: with all the children around the world who need homes, why did she pick a child from a country that a)does not allow foreign adoptions, and b)who has a living father?

I understand Africa - why not Ethiopia or Liberia, two countries that allow adoptions by foreigners?

And why this boy? I admit to being sceptical about the so-called statements by the father - not that he would have those emotions but their timing seemed very media-created to me - but why not choose a child whose parents were dead? If there are 800,000 children in the orphanages in Malawi then surely she could have found one who truly had no one?

That's the only and last thing I'm going to say about M.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
That's one of my biggest questions too - with all those orphans in Africa, why pick a child with a living relative? I want not to discuss this, but.....

Who is watching M on Oprah today?
PermalinkPermalink 10/25/06 @ 09:41
Comment from: grant [Member] Email · http://china.adoptionblogs.com/
Well.... a lot depends on what "orphan" means. By some standards (including those of the US Citizen & Immigration Service), an "orphan" is a child with at least one parent who can no longer care for him or her -- making many children of single moms and dads orphans.

More on that definition here:
http://www.ethicanet.org/item.php?recordid=orphanbyanyname&pagestyle=default

I have a suspicion a lot of orphanages around the world are full of kids with a living biological parent somewhere.

PermalinkPermalink 10/25/06 @ 10:42
Comment from: Adrienne Bashista [Member] Email · http://russia.adoptionblogs.com/
I agree with you, Grant. My son, for example, was technically an orphan although he has a living birth mother. This is the case of many, many children who are adopted every year - from the U.S. as well as internationally.
But at the same time, since apparently she had all 800,000 to choose from, her people could have done a little homework to make sure that this problem didn't occur. She is a public figure. She could've probably figured out that this would happen - there would've been less fodder for discussion had she adopted a child with no family at all. That's the point I was trying to make.
PermalinkPermalink 10/25/06 @ 10:47
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Of course, I do understand that many children are adopted who have one or more living parent(s). I imagine that Grant is right that orphanages do have some children who have living relatives somewhere.

I agree with your thoughts on this matter though, Adrienne. With all the truly parentless orphans to choose from, why choose a child with a living parent who might squawk? Maybe her "advisors" failed her? Angelina already went through a somewhat similar issue with the grandparent of one of her children. Why risk the possible grief, right?
PermalinkPermalink 10/25/06 @ 12:19
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Misc

Subscribe to Russia Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 143